There is no question that children and young people must be protected from all kinds of assaults. Finding someone to volunteer for children and youth today is becoming increasingly difficult. Against this background and on the occasion of a new law for a more active protection of the youngest citizens, which is in force since this year, the youth welfare committee was challenged. The youth and family department of the district office had developed a recommendation that should also be passed on to the municipalities. It was passed unanimously.
The recommendation contains concrete suggestions for prevention, so that persons with a serious criminal record are not employed in youth welfare activities, including community vacation programs. This means that for certain activities, adult caregivers must present extended certificates of good conduct: if the caregivers care for children and adolescents alone, without the participation of the parents, or not in public, or for more than one day.
"This is a very difficult topic", deputy district administrator johann pfister (BBL), who chaired the meeting, stated right at the beginning and referred to the current topic of "fish passes. It's still early days, he made clear. The discussion showed that the ideas developed in this meeting will probably have to be fleshed out later.
Bernd fricke (grune) praised the regulation put up for debate, but found it not so easy to handle.
Head of department hans-jurgen tytyk explained his department's proposal, or rather the intention of the law: persons who have already been convicted of a serious offence should not look after, supervise, educate or do anything similar to children and adolescents. This is to be ensured by the public providers of youth services, i.E. His area of expertise, but also by the municipalities. With the request for an extended certificate of compliance. In contrast to the regular management report, the extended report contains references to violations of sexual self-determination, for example, which otherwise do not appear in the regular management report after a certain period of time. In response to a question, tytyk explained that for some years now, those working in his department have been required to submit extended certificates of good conduct.
The time to address the issue, tytyk made clear, is the approaching vacations. And that's where communities offer vacation programs (that falls under youth welfare).Siegfried stengel (CSU) thought it was a good idea to include the topic on the agenda. The recommendation will help the communities. At the same time, he noted that an extended certificate of good conduct is directed to the past and, in a nutshell, is no guarantee for the future. Fricke summarized the debate as follows: "we are largely in agreement that the point creates awareness of the problem." He also suggested to think about a certain codex, to raise awareness. It's not about controlling volunteers, it's about everyday life.
As tytyk made clear at the outset, this is a difficult issue. A gratuitous stroll between "alienating volunteers and ensuring the mission of protection". After careful consideration, the department drew up the proposed regulation, which should be as practicable as possible. Communities are recommended to proceed in a similar manner.The regulation also applies to contacts within the framework of youth welfare services that are handled by the youth welfare office or the municipality.